About

Discerning Citizen

HomeIssuesLinksReadingNewsletters

 

Home > Issues > Homosexuality > Dishonesty Surrounds CA Gay Marriage Bill

 

Dishonesty Surrounds CA Gay Marriage Bill

Posted June 6, 2005

By M. Roberts

   The State of California dodged another radical, leftist bullet with the defeat of AB 19 in the State Assembly. With AB 19, the pro-gay crowd has proven once again that the law and the will of the people are of little consequence when it comes to enacting their radical, anti-family agenda. The bill, introduced in December 2004 by Assemblyman Mark Leno (D-San Francisco), would have changed California marriage law to make it "gender-neutral". Assemblyman Leno does not seem to be concerned that California voters outlawed gay marriage in 2000 with the approval of Proposition 22, which was passed with a 2/3 majority. Additionally, the Assemblyman does not seem to be concerned that statewide referendums such as Proposition 22 cannot be overturned without the consent of state voters, according to Article II, section 10(c) of the California State Constitution. Leno even goes so far as to assert that AB 19 does not violate the state Constitution at all with respect to Proposition 22 because, according to him, it “was designed to prevent California from being forced to recognize the marriages of same-sex couples who were married outside of California” (emphasis added). 1 This is a blatant falsehood. California voters knew exactly what they were voting for when they overwhelmingly passed Proposition 22. The Proposition was not designed to simply prevent the recognition of out-of-state gay marriages, which were not legal anywhere in the United States in 2000. The efforts of the Assemblyman are just another example of the rampant elitism of a radical left that is even willing to overturn the 2/3 vote of the California electorate.

   Many thanks and congratulations go out to those members of the California Assembly who are on the record with “No” votes on AB 19! The votes, as tabulated by Capitol Resource Institute, are as follows:

 

Noes: Aghazarian, Arambula, Baca, Benoit, Blakeslee, Bogh, Cogdill, Daucher, De Vore, Emmerson, Garcia, Harman, Haynes, Shirley Horton, Houston, Huff, Keene, La Malfa, La Suer, Leslie, Matthews, Maze, McCarthy, Mountjoy, Nakanishi, Niello, Parra, Plescia, Sharon Runner, Spitzer, Strickland, Tran, Vargas, Villines, Walters, and Wyland

Ayes: Bass, Berg, Bermudez, Calderon, Canciamilla, Chan, Chavez, Chu, Cohn, Coto, De La Torre, Evans, Frommer, Goldberg, Hancock, Jones, Karnette, Klehs, Koretz, Laird, Leno, Levine, Lieber, Liu, Montanez, Mullin, Nation, Nava, Oropeza, Pavley, Ridley-Thomas, Ruskin, Saldana, Torrico, Wolk, Yee, and Nunez

Absences, abstentions, or not voting: Dymally, Gordon, Jerome Horton, Negrete McLeod, Richman, Salinas, and Umberg  

1. Assembly Judiciary Committee Approves Leno’s Marriage Equality Bill. (April 26, 2005). Retrieved 6/6/2005, from http://democrats.assembly.ca.gov/members/

a13/press/a132005008.htm

^ Top

 

Copyright © 2005, 2006, 2007 Discerning Citizen. All rights reserved.

Email the webmaster with comments on the site design.

Photos courtesy of freefoto.com.