About

Discerning Citizen

HomeIssuesLinksReadingNewsletters

 

Home > Issues > Economy > China Threatens to Use the "Nuclear Option"

 

China Threatens to Use the "Nuclear Option"

Posted August 11, 2007

By M. Roberts

 
The rich rules over the poor, and the borrower becomes the lender's slave.
- Proverbs 22:7 (NASB)
 

   Americans ought to be furious that our elected leaders have put us in this position. China threatened Wednesday to use the "nuclear option" on the U.S. dollar if Congress succeeds in passing a trade law intended to strong-arm China into allowing its currency, the yuan, to appreciate against other currencies. 1 Many members of Congress have increasingly complained in recent years that China artificially suppresses the value of the yuan to boost exports and give it an unfair trade advantage. Many experts point to this as a big reason for the burgeoning U.S. trade deficit with China, which totaled $96 billion for the year at the end of May. 2 With its trade profits, China has accumulated vast U.S. dollar holdings, including a large amount of U.S. government debt. This makes China our creditor and puts us in some measure of subservience to the Chinese. As I have written before, the United States continues to expand its money supply, resulting in a relentless slide in the purchasing power of the dollar. Nations like China that have bought up large dollar holdings and held them in reserve have artificially propped up the purchasing power of the dollar by creating increased demand for the dollar. Without this generosity and that of other nations that do the same, the purchasing power of the dollar would be much lower than it is today and prices on the goods we all purchase every day would be much higher due to higher inflation. In other words, the accumulation of dollar holdings by the Chinese has kept inflation in the U.S. much lower than it otherwise would be. So what is China's so-called 'nuclear option'? Because China holds so many dollars in reserve, dumping them all at once could in a single stroke destroy the purchasing power of the dollar, driving up inflation and interest rates and sending our economy into a tailspin. Yes folks, because our federal government has refused to end the red ink, we are now in the position of hoping that China is nice enough not to destroy our economy. Would China actually follow through with its threat? Hard to say, because to some extent they rely on exports to the U.S. and a reasonably stable U.S. economy to support the financial needs of the country. However, China could eventually decide they do not need a strong American economy when their domestic economy grows to the point that it can rely less on exports. Additionally, the Chinese have already made it clear they wish to diversify out of U.S. dollar investments because they continue to lose value due to the slide in the dollar. Based on this, we can expect that China will, at some point, offload a significant amount of their dollar holdings. And we, as proud Americans, will be in the position of begging them to go easy on us.

   There are a couple of important points to emphasize here. First, China is not our friend. Senior Chinese military personnel have spoken openly in the past that they believe war with the United States is "inevitable", presumably over Taiwan. 3 A friendly country would never say such a thing, nor would it threaten to destroy our currency and send our economy into a tailspin. Second, it is our esteemed leaders in Congress and the Administration, both current and past, that have put us in this position by spending us into a hole $9 trillion deep. We once were the world's creditor, but we have become the largest debtor in history so that we can continue to finance our consumption and government entitlements. If Congress and the Administration actually balanced the budget and kept it balanced, maybe we wouldn't be in the position of having to hope a foreign and hostile power won't drop a currency bomb on our economy. Third, if the dollar was still a commodity-backed currency as our Founders intended, we would not be in this position. Having a gold standard limits government spending to whatever gold exists in the Treasury. If the gold runs out, the government has to either stop spending or find somebody to lend it more gold. The government is forced to balance the books; there would be no option to fire up the printing press and kill us all with inflation or borrow endlessly from foreign powers. The dollar also would be based on the rock-solid value of gold, which has changed little throughout human history. With a gold-backed dollar, there wouldn't be a "nuclear option".

   Folks, America needs desperately to return to the principles of limited government upon which our nation was founded. Our Founders never intended for the federal government to be so large, have so much power, and be involved in so many things. A return to the gold standard would force the federal government to balance its books and put an end to destructive inflation and endless government borrowing. It would also force it to make tough choices about its priorities, likely resulting in the abolition of countless unconstitutional federal programs. As Alan Greenspan once explained, a gold standard is essential to our freedom and independence; let us return to it and reclaim the freedom and independence our Founders intended us to have.

1. Unease at China's Threat to Sell Dollar. (Aug. 8, 2007). Retrieved Aug. 11, 2007, from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/08/09/cnfxnews109.xml
2. U.S. Census Bureau
3. Constantine C. Menges, China: The Gathering Threat (Nashville, TN: Nelson Current, 2005), pg. xv
^ Top

 

Copyright © 2005, 2006, 2007 Discerning Citizen. All rights reserved.

Email the webmaster with comments on the site design.

Photos courtesy of freefoto.com.