About

Discerning Citizen

HomeIssuesLinksReadingNewsletters

 

Home > Issues > Church and State > Free Speech Rights of Students Violated Again

 

Free Speech Rights of Students Violated Again

Posted June 20, 2006

By M. Roberts

  “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . .” – First Amendment, U.S. Constitution

   As seems to be the case too many times these days, the free speech rights of another student have been violated again. School officials cut short a valedictorian speech by Las Vegas teen Brittany McComb when it was apparent that she intended to deviate from the edited version of her speech approved by school officials. So what exactly was removed from the speech? Numerous references to Miss McComb's Christian beliefs, of course. School officials believed that her references to Christianity would somehow violate the First Amendment because they would constitute a prohibited establishment of religion. Maybe the school officials ought to be reminded about what an establishment of religion actually looks like. The House Judiciary Committee Report of 1853-1854 describes what is required for something to be a religious establishment: 

It must have a creed defining what a man must believe; it must have rites and ordinances which believers must observe; it must have ministers of defined qualifications to teach the doctrines and administer the rites; it must have tests for the submissive and penalties for the nonconformist. 1

The Senate Judiciary Committee provides even more insight: 

The clause speaks of ‘an establishment of religion’. What is meant by that expression? It referred, without doubt, to that establishment which existed in the mother-country . . . . [which was an] endowment, at the public expense, in exclusion of or in preference to any other, by giving its members exclusive political rights, and by compelling attendance of those who rejected its communion upon its worship or religious observances. 2

So, the question is whether Miss McComb was actually creating a national church by mentioning Jesus in her valedictorian speech. It is hard to believe that any reasonable person would think so, therefore it is safe to conclude that her speech did not in fact violate the First Amendment. If anything, what was truly violated were her First  Amendment rights to express her religious views, even if some people don't like them.

1. David Barton, Original Intent: The Courts, the Constitution, and Religion (Aledo, TX: Wallbuilder Press, 2000), pg 30.  

2. Barton, pg. 30-31.  
^ Top

 

Copyright © 2005, 2006, 2007 Discerning Citizen. All rights reserved.

Email the webmaster with comments on the site design.

Photos courtesy of freefoto.com.