We all know that
politics and hypocrisy go hand-in-hand these days, but sometimes
the level of hypocrisy to which some politicians will stoop is
truly astounding. House Democrats John Dingell (D-Michigan) and
Bennie G. Thompson (D-Mississippi) filed a brief at the U.S.
Supreme Court on Monday "that questions the constitutionality"
of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security waiving laws to make
it easier to build a congressionally mandated security fence at
the southern border. With the authorization of Congress, the DHS
filed waivers last week that would suspend over 30 laws so that
the border fence could be finished without being locked up in
endless court challenges. Representative Thompson said the
following in a press release:
"The
American people entrust Congress to ensure that the laws of
this land are faithfully executed not excused by the
Executive Branch."
Representative
Dingell echoed Thompson's sentiments with a statement of his
own:
"The
blanket waiver of laws like the Clean Air Act and the Safe
Drinking Water Act is a clear and disturbing abuse of the
secretary's discretion."
1
If these
Democrats are so concerned about how the Executive Branch
enforces the law, it might be nice to see them speak up about
how the Bush Administration continues to refuse to enforce
immigration laws. However, based on their voting records, the
likelihood of that is about as remote as Al Gore repudiating
global warming. Pro-border enforcement lobbying group U.S.
Border Patrol gave both Thompson and Dingell the same rating in
2005 and 2006 they gave the blatant open-borders apologist John
Cornyn: 0%. 2
Not sure how one could get any worse than that on border issues.
Both Representatives also voted against the tough H.R. 4437, the
Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration
Control Act of 2005. 3
It is obvious
that the real agenda here, like always, is to defeat any policy
that might limit illegal immigration. One cannot help but be
impressed at the audacity of the hypocritical demands of these
two clowns.